U.S. News, 23 - 30 June 2008, Letters Rebuttals
Why would the magazine even publish John Gramm's letter insisting that the Bible was literal? Pointless religious diatribe has no place in a serious discussion, especially crap as ridiculous and full of ignorance of reality as that. Does the letters editor use some sort of crazy trick to choose the letters to publish? I thought some vetting was done, but I must have been mistaken.
phrebh on 06.18.08 @ 05:42 AM CST [link] [No Comments] [Karma: 0 (+/-)]



