[Previous entry: "U.S. News, 16 June 2008, Letters Rebuttals"] [Next entry: "U.S. News, 7 - 14 July 2008, Letters Rebuttals"]

06/18/2008: "U.S. News, 23 - 30 June 2008, Letters Rebuttals"

Why would the magazine even publish John Gramm's letter insisting that the Bible was literal? Pointless religious diatribe has no place in a serious discussion, especially crap as ridiculous and full of ignorance of reality as that. Does the letters editor use some sort of crazy trick to choose the letters to publish? I thought some vetting was done, but I must have been mistaken.